Consultation
801.572.0900
Elder Law Attorneys Serving Salt Lake County, Utah
Share

Utah Probate, Elder Law, Medicaid, Guardianship and Special Needs Blog

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Is my Advanced Directive from another State Considered Valid in Utah?

The validity of an out-of-state Advanced Directive in Utah is a cause of common concern among clients.  The Utah Advance Directive Health Care Act states in Title 75-2a-121 that a "health care provider may, in good faith, rely on any health care directive, power of attorney or similar instrument: (a) executed in another state..." 

So, the answer is "yes".  Most likely your health care provider will recognize the validity of that out-of-state instrument.

However, if you are living in Utah (and have the requisite capacity), you may want to compare the Utah statutory form with your out-of-state Advanced Directive to ensure that your desires with respect to agency and end of life treatment are sufficiently represented on your Advanced Directive.


Thursday, September 29, 2011

Senior Expo Hours

I'll be at the Senior Expo today from 8-12.  See you there!


Monday, September 12, 2011

2011 Senior Expo

The Elder Law Section of the Utah State Bar will participate in this year's Senior Expo at the South Towne Expo Center in Sandy.  Volunteer attorneys concentrating in Elder Law will be on hand on 9/29 and 9/30  from 8 am to 7 pm on Thurday and 8 am to 4 pm on Friday to answer questions relating to general law matters affecting seniors.  I'll see you there!


Sunday, September 11, 2011

Senior Wish Program/CNS Hospice Patients

Recently I learned of a wonderful program offered by Community Nursing Services in Salt Lake City, Utah called the "Senior Wish Program".  If  hospice services are provided by CNS they become eligible for the “Senior Wish Program” which seeks to fulfill a wish for hospice patients (such as reuniting of family and friends).  The website for CNS is:  http://www.cns-cares.org .  All “wishes” are provided by donors…such as plane tickets, money etc.  The program director told me that recently she took one hospice patient to a local amusement park called "Lagoon" because of the fond memories he had of the park as a boy.  Although he was in a wheel chair, he loved his time there.  If you would like to make donations to this program, please contact CNS through their website.


Sunday, September 11, 2011

Joint Tenancy, Paid on Death (POD) and Transfer on Death (TOD) Designations

You may have thought that adding a child as a joint tenant on your home or paid-on-death beneficiary of an account would be a good idea in order to avoid the probate process when you die… but did you know that how you title your home and bank accounts could also have a dramatic and unintended effect on your estate planning?

Example:

Here’s an example:  John and Mary create mirror wills that leave their home and bank accounts to their four children in equal shares.  They appoint their oldest son, Robert, to be the personal representative under both their wills.   John and Mary also decide to add their son, Robert, as a joint tenant on the deed to their home and they also added Robert as a paid on death beneficiary of all their jointly held bank accounts. John dies, then Mary dies.  Even though John and Mary wanted their children to inherit all their property in equal shares, legally Robert now owns everything.  This is not the result that John and Mary wanted.

Joint Tenancy:

 “Joint Tenancy” is a way for two or more people to share ownership of real estate or other property. When one of the owners of the property dies, the share of that owner in the property automatically transfers to the surviving owner(s).  This automatic transfer attribute of joint tenancy is called “the right of survivorship”.  Many people do not realize that the right of survivorship trumps alternate designations in wills or trusts.   Therefore, in the example above, John and Mary’s written desires in their wills take a back seat to the designation of Robert as a joint tenant.  In other words, Robert’s ownership as a joint tenant trumps contrary directions in John and Mary’s Wills.

Paid on Death Designations:

Similarly, “Paid on Death (POD)” or “Transfer on Death (TOD)” designations on bank accounts also trump alternative directions in wills and trusts.  A bank is contractually obligated to pay to the order of whom the account owner designates as beneficiary of those funds upon death of the account owner.  In the example above, John and Mary’s bank was contractually obligated to pay Robert the balance of funds in his parent(s)’ accounts upon their death.

What should John and Mary have done?

An elder law attorney would have alerted John and Mary to the conflict that their beneficiary designations created.  By allowing the titled property to go through the probate process, their intentions under their wills would have taken effect.  Additionally, a properly funded joint or individual family trust could have avoided probate and ensured that their assets would have been divided equally among their children.


← Newer1 2 3 4 5Older →

Archived Posts

2021
2018
October
September
August
April
March
February
January
2017
2016
2015
2013
2012
2011



© 2021 Kathie Brown Roberts P.C. | Disclaimer
9045 S. 1300 East, Ste. 100, Sandy, UT 84094
| Phone: 801-572-0900

Contested Matters in Utah Probate and Guardianships | Elder Law / Medicaid Planning | Guardianships / Conservatorships | Estate Planning | Special Needs Planning | Utah Probate & Estate Administration Guide | Veterans Benefits | | Video Library

FacebookGoogle+

Attorney Website Design by
Zola Creative